Vancouver Agreement Authorship
The Editorial Board also stresses that the development or revision and final approval of the version to be published are necessary for paternity. Lately, the author`s principle has sparked some very interesting discussions in our community. In the face of the increasing use of preprint servers, we have questioned the workflows of conference publishing .A. These were most often related to peer-review biases, but also to the author: should we allow blind pre-print publications? In publishing their scientific work, authors would generally assume a number of legal obligations arising from the agreement signed with the publisher. In particular with regard to the guarantee that no plagiarism has been committed and that the publication of the scientific work does not violate the rights of others. This can give rise to reflections when scientific work contains quotations from other works or when the work contains statements that may be defamatory. See publication of articles and books. The Vancouver group`s recommendations are an important attempt to formulate a number of guidelines for determining paternity. The Vancouver group is the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which introduced a series of paternity criteria in 1985. The criteria have been updated over the years to reflect the latest developments in research and publishing. Their scope goes far beyond the author`s theme and extends to the scientific publication process: revision, editorial work, publishing, copyright, etc.
As a general rule, it should be specified the division of labour between the authors of the publication, for example. B in a note. In many cases, a real joint author`s statement is established, which describes in detail the contributions of the various authors. See also the Vancouver rules. Authors: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) – Vancouver Group Summary: The author demands an “essential contribution” to EITHER But the author is no joke: he can make and break research careers, and his fair treatment can make the difference between a wonderful and a restless person. A fair and transparent approach to fatherhood is particularly important for young scientists. There, the great PhD stories might contain the following assumptions: If you write a doctoral thesis with articles with co-authors, your co-authors must make signed co-author statements. The statement should contain a description of your contribution and the contribution of the co-authors to this article. It is particularly important that your independent contribution can be identified. The statement contains consent to include the article in your doctoral theses. This right to be recognized as the author of a work cannot be waived “except with regard to the use of the work, which is limited in terms of nature and scope” (see Article 3, paragraph 3, of the Danish Copyright Act).
Therefore, an author cannot enter into a binding agreement, which allows another person to present himself as a single author in any context, see Morten Rosenmeier`s Guide to Copyright, Ophavsret for begyndere – in bog til ikke-jurist (3rd edition, 2014) p. 78ff. DCSD finds that the complainant participated in the research cooperation with the defendant and that the complainant thus contributed to the results you should expect the complainant to be interested in being published with the other listed researchers.